因?yàn)?/c>只有百分之二的顧客有不滿之辭,所以其余百分之九十八的人肯定是滿意的。
Thirdly, the arguer fails to consider the viewpoint of the students that would be living in the futuristic or experimental housing.
第三,論述者也沒(méi)有考慮到入住到這座未來(lái)派或實(shí)驗(yàn)性建筑中的學(xué)生的看法。
Without such information, the argument is pure speculation and nothing more than a statement of the arguer's opinion.
沒(méi)有此類信息,該段論述純屬臆想和推測(cè),所陳述的僅是論述者的主觀看法而已。
The arguer assumes that UV radiation damage is the reason for the decline in the population but totally ignores all other possible reasons.
論述者假設(shè)紫外線的破壞是該種群數(shù)量下降的原因,但卻完全忽略了所有其他各種可然性原因。
But critics of online relationships arguer that no one can truly know another person in cyberspace.
但是網(wǎng)絡(luò)戀情的批評(píng)者認(rèn)為沒(méi)有人能夠真正在網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間認(rèn)識(shí)一個(gè)人。
Investment projects often occur policy-making, it mainly because decision maker's will and the arguer's authority obey personality.
投資項(xiàng)目往往會(huì)發(fā)生決策失誤,究其原因,主要在于決策者的意志和論證者的權(quán)威性服從人格。
After all, the arguer offers relevant evidence that a nearby community named Brookville benefits from these restrictions.
畢竟作者提供了相關(guān)證據(jù)——附近的一個(gè)名為Brookville的社區(qū)從這些限制措施里獲益。
Put me into the right situation and I am a great arguer. I might even be the best.
在某些場(chǎng)合,我有可能成為一個(gè)“吵架能手”,甚至可能是最棒的。
By discussing vandalism and crime as one and the same, the arguer has critically weakened his or her argument.
由于將毀壞公共財(cái)物的行為與犯罪當(dāng)作同一概念來(lái)討論,論述者甚為嚴(yán)重地削弱了自己的論述。
In summary, the arguer bases his or her argument on vague and unconvincing evidence.
歸納而言,論述者將其論述基于模糊不清的和無(wú)法令人置信的證據(jù)上。
The arguer is hoping we'll just focus on the uncontroversial premise, "Murder is morally wrong, " and not notice what is being assumed.
論者希望我們把注意的是一個(gè)不容質(zhì)疑的前提上,“謀殺在道德上是錯(cuò)誤的”而忽略其它的假定。
Often, the arguer never returns to the original issue.
通常論者不會(huì)再回到原來(lái)的問(wèn)題。
The arguer also commits a fallacy of false analogy.
論者也犯了一個(gè)錯(cuò)誤類比的邏輯錯(cuò)誤。
In addition, the arguer comes to the conclusion that high intensity lighting is apparently the most effective way to combat crime.
此外,論述者得出這樣一個(gè)結(jié)論,即高密度照明系統(tǒng)顯然是打擊犯罪的最有效途徑。
This argument is unconvincing because the arguer reaches the conclusion based on faulty logic.
這一論證缺乏說(shuō)服力,因?yàn)?/c>論證者所得出的結(jié)論是基于錯(cuò)誤的邏輯。