voegelin

voegelin

美 　英

• 網絡弗格林；沃爾格林；高年

例句

What if Voegelin's attacks on Gnosticism were a rhetorical deception to disguise the true origins of totalitarianism?

如果沃格林對靈知主義的攻擊是為了掩蓋極權主義的真正起源的修辭把戲，又會如何呢？

Thus, without reference to anything authentically Gnostic, Voegelin claims that Nietzsche represents a "gnosis shut off" from transcendence.

于是在沒有引用任何靈知主義的權威著作的情況下，沃格林宣稱尼采代表了“靈知相對于超越性的隔離”。

Unpacking Voegelin's characterization of gnosis will show why it is so thoroughly misleading.

對沃格林關于靈知主義的界定加以拆解會告訴我們為什么它是如此徹底的具有誤導性。

Gnosis here is described as being "shut off, " when earlier Voegelin admitted that it meant "freedom" and "salvation. "

“靈知”在此處被描述為“隔絕”，但是在這之前沃格林承認它意味著“自由”、與“拯救”。

Voegelin extends his condemnation of Gnosticism not only to Hegel and Protestantism, but beyond it to virtually the entire modern world.

沃格林并不僅僅把它對靈知主義的譴責拓展到黑格爾與新教主義身上，事實上，他的凌駕設計整個現代世界。

Voegelin corresponded for many years with Alfred Schutz, to whom on January 1, 1953, he wrote concerning his views on Christianity.

沃格林與阿爾弗雷德·舒茨保持了數年的通信，并于1953年一月寫道其對舒茨的基督教觀點的關注。

In this letter and in much of his later work, Voegelin confuses Gnosticism and "historical eschatology" or millennialism.

在這封信以及大量的后來著作中，沃格林混淆了靈知主義與“歷史末世論”或千禧年主義。

Faith and Political Philosophy: The Correspondence between Leo Strauss and Eric Voegelin

信仰與政治哲學：施特勞斯與沃格林通信集

Voegelin's antignosticism and the origins of totalitarianism. (Notes and Commentary)

沃格林的反靈知主義與極權主義的起源（注釋與評論）

Political philosophy of Eric Voegelin

論沃格林的政治哲學