microformats
美 
英
例句
At this point, it looks like Google is forging ahead with its own structured data standards - and largely ignoring microformats.
不過，Google似乎在打造它自己的結構化數據標準，忽視了微格式。
Microformats, another version of structured data in XHTML, was launched a little more than a year later by a grassroots group of developers.
微格式是XHTML中另一版本的結構化數據，它由一群草根開發人員在一年多后推出。
This idea of capturing and leveraging microformats across applications is one of our favorite proposed directions for the future.
我們看好通過應用程序抓取并利用微格式的發展方向。
Microformats work best where they add a very little bit of nuance to common constructs in a host language such as HTML, XHTML, or Atom.
微格式最擅于在某個主體語言（如HTML、XHTML或Atom）中對一些通常的結構加入少量細微的差別。
The Web site for microformats is a wiki on which you can add your own formats for whatever data you want to represent.
微格式的Web站點就像是一個維基百科，您可為想展示的任何數據添加您自己的格式。
Some microformats try to tunnel specialized structure into the constructs of the host language.
一些微格式試圖把專有的結構嵌入到主體語言的結構中去。
Microformats are guided by a set of design principles and are developed by community consensus.
微格式以一組設計準則為指向，根據社區的一致意見而開發。
Microformats allow you to present metadata in your HTML using existing standards (see Resources).
微格式可以在HTML中使用現有標準（請參閱參考資料）表示元數據。
But before that, let me talk a little about the pros and cons of microformats.
在此之前，先簡要介紹一下微格式的優點和缺點。
In the last XML Matters article, I mentioned that microformats could really come into their own when coupled with Atom (see Resources).
上一期“XML問題”文章中，我提到只有與Atom結合起來微格式才能真正得到應用（請參閱參考資料）。
Much of this data is being structured using Semantic Web technologies like RDFa or microformats.
這其中的絕大部分數據都使用了諸如RDFa和microformats這樣的語義網絡（SemanticWeb）技術進行了處理。
Ultimately the goal of microformats is to make data easier for humans to parse, while keeping the data friendly for machines to parse.
微格式的最終目標是讓數據更便于人類閱讀，同時保持數據對機器解析的友好性。
This method accepts a microformats name, a document reference to start the search from, and an optional array of parameters.
該方法的參數包括微格式名稱、搜索的文檔引用和可選的參數數組。
Perhaps we just caught the first glimpse of the missing link with Mozilla's announcement that Firefox will support Microformats.
Mozilla聲明Firefox將支持微軟格式，從這里我們可能剛好瞥見缺失的那一環。
With Microformats, semantic value is added to existing HTML content by using consistent patterns of standard HTML elements and attributes.
借助Microformats，通過對標準HTML元素和屬性使用一致模式，向現有HTML內容中添加了語義價值。
Other microformats that are widely accepted include hCard, a way to embed detailed contact info in a web page.
（另一種被廣泛接受的微格（microformat）是hCard，一種向網頁中添加聯系人的詳細信息的技術。）
Google has started to index a handful of vocabularies around people, reviews and video content using both microformats and RDFa.
Google已開始用微格式和RDFa為涉及大眾、評論以及視頻內容的詞匯建立索引。
The lack of support for microformats in these lightweight markup languages is understandable.
這些輕量級標記語言缺乏對微格式的支持是可以理解的。
What will be particularly interesting to watch is how microformats, the Web community's open standards for structured data, will fare.
特別需要關注的是微格式（microformat），一種Web社區的結構化數據開放式標準，將開始應用。
Certainly nuance microformats are useful, and build on classic respect for rough consensus and running code.
毫無疑問，有細微差別的微格式是很實用的，構建它時考慮了有關開發的大致共識和現有的運行代碼。
Microformats are a pragmatic approach to solving the issue of structured data on the Web.
微格式是一種注重實效的方法，解決了Web上結構化數據的問題。
Although both Microsoft and Yahoo have shown some support for microformats, is it enough to stop Google?
盡管微軟和雅虎已經開始支持微格式，是不是已經足以抵御Google了呢？
The very community that microformats claim to embrace should serve as warning for when microformats go too far.
微格式宣稱擁有的社區應該在微格式日行漸遠的時候向大家發出警告。
Most of these are what microformats designers call elemental microformats, which are those constructed entirely within an element.
其中大部分是微格式開發人員所稱的基本微格式（elementalmicroformats），基本微格式就是完全在某個元素內部構造而成的微格式。
Now the pages they generate in one system can simply be fed directly into your web service as the input.
Microformats在某個系統中生成的頁面能夠被作為你的Web服務的輸入。
That's the big con of new standards -- even XML standards -- and the big plus of microformats.
這是新標準乃至XML標準的一個很大的缺點，卻是微格式的顯著優點。
Until now. Microformats are one small step forward toward exporting structured data on the Web.
迄今為止，微格式是向著導出Web上的結構化數據這一方向邁進的一小步。
Now look at these microformats in more detail to see how to implement them in your code.
現在查看這些微格式的具體信息，以查看怎樣在代碼中實施它們。
This article looks to bring back some perspective of where microformats make sense and where something else is worth a hard look.
這篇文章旨在介紹微格式的適用范圍，以及一些值得重點注意的地方。
Likely candidates are Microformats, and RDFa.
Microformats和RDFa是可能性較高的候選格式。
The pet use-case for microformats is Weblogging.
Web日志是微格式的一個熱點用例。
Microformats are just that kind of idea.
微格式正是這樣一種理念。
Microformats were created as small, focused, domain-specific naming conventions for weaving certain kinds of data in HTML.
因而，微格式得以作為一種小規模、目標明確、特定領域的命名規則而創立，它可以將特定類型的數據織入HTML中。
The first line of Listing 3 loads the microformats API, which is needed for anything else to work.
清單3中的第一行加載微格式API，這是其他后續工作的基礎。
Microformats exist for narrow but common items of data such as contact information and calendar items.
Microformats的存在是為了服務有限但常見的數據項（如聯系人信息和日歷項）。
To some, the Semantic Web is the web of data, where information is represented in RDF and OWL.
對于一些人來說，語義網是一個數據的網絡，其中數據被表示為RDF與OWL，又或者是Microformats格式。
This has given microformats a great start towards their goal of improving Web microcontent (blogs, for example) publishing in general.
這通常給微格式朝著改進Web微內容（例如，博客）發布的目標前進帶來了良好的開端。
For the document approach we can come at microformats from the structured text side.
對于文檔方面，我們可以從結構化文本開始接近微格式。
That's all there is to microformats.
這就是微格式要處理的全部。
One problem with microformats is that there isn't a generic way to parse them.
微格式存在一個問題，即沒有一種解析它們的通用方式。
